DFF–Research Project Grants 1 | Humanities
In order to strengthen the quality of Danish research, IRFD offers funding for research projects within a framework of up to DKK 1,800,000, excluding overhead. What characterises a DFF–Research Project 1 is a clear and well defined problem statement, where the research activities must be at a high, international level.
The applicant must be able to document independent research experience typically corresponding to 3 years of research or more after having obtained a PhD (or similar qualifications).The applicant’s previous results will be assessed in relation to his/her career, and in relation to the scientific challenges of the project applied for. If the applicant is not an associate professor or has been awarded a positive associate professor assessment and the project involves the education of researchers, it must be stated in the application how the relevant supervision will be provided, and how the scientific connection with the project will be ensured.
The fund awards DFF–Research Project 1 grants for a maximum duration of 3 years, with a budget of up to DKK 1,800,000, excluding overhead. To facilitate external review of applications, the project description, CV and list of publications must be written in English.
The length of your project description must not exceed 5 A4 pages, and it must be drawn up using the IRFD–Project Description template, in accordance with the guidelines.
The contents of any sub-projects, including PhD and postdoctoral projects, must be described in the project description.
Funding for PhD and postdoctoral scholarships may be included in the application, if they have a clear function within, and form an integral part of the research project. Postdoctoral candidates must have obtained their PhD or achieved equivalent qualifications (e.g. a positive assistant professorship evaluation ("adjunktbedømmelse") within the last four years at the time of the application deadline. Periods of leave of absence will be deducted from the PhD age.
Funding for the education of PhD candidates is granted under the provision that the candidate is enrolled in a PhD programme.
You must account for the intended recruitment process, if you apply for support for unnamed postdocs.
To read about the requirements for your budget, and for a description of what you may apply for, see Appendix C.
Application form and appendices
The application form contains a number of fields to be filled in before you submit your application. For example your application must contain a popularised science description (in Danish) of your project. Therefore you are advised to register your application in e-grant in due time before the application deadline and to make yourself familiar with the content of the application form.
You must submit your application via e-grant and enclose the following appendices in PDF format:
- Project description, using the IRFD–Project Description template and references/bibliography. The project description must be maximum 5 A4 pages (including figures and tables) excluding references/bibliography.
- Applicant's CV
- List of publications for applicant
- If the entire project, or significant parts of it, has a host institution (actual place where the research activities will be carried out) which differs from the institution administering the grant, a written statement from the host institution must be included. The statement must confirm that the activities can take place at the host institution and include a brief description of the collaboration and the main activities planned
- The employing institution’s confirmation of the budget and acknowledgement that it will host the project, using the template “IRFD–budget confirmation ” (see Appendix C). The budget must be completed using the fund’s mandatory budget template in Excel format. The budget must be uploaded to e-grant as an independent file (not merged with the application form). Any confirmed economic contribution(s) from other sources, must be included in the budget.
If relevant, you may also enclose the following additional appendices:
- CVs and lists of publications for other scientific participants central to the project
- If PhD scholarships are applied for with named candidates in mind, the following appendices must be enclosed: academic transcript/diploma, CV and, if relevant, a list of publications for the candidates
- If postdoctoral scholarships are applied for with named candidates in mind, the following appendices must be enclosed: CV, list of publications and PhD diploma. Alternatively, the following documentation must be provided:
- a) acceptance of the thesis for defence,
- b) a positive assistant professorship evaluation (“adjunktbedømmelse”),
- c) qualifications equivalent to PhD level qualifications achieved in another way, or
- d) a declaration from the supervisor stating the expected date of submission of the thesis within 6 months after the application deadline (PhD students).
If you apply to IRFD | Humanities, you must also enclose the candidate’s PhD evaluation. If the candidate does not receive a PhD evaluation, a brief summary of the thesis (1-2 A4 pages) must be enclosed.
- If the project involves collaboration with foreign partners, private enterprises or other beneficiaries of the research results, statements from such parties confirming the collaboration may be enclosed (maximum one page each). Documentation for the purchase of equipment in excess of DKK 500,000, excluding overhead, e.g. in the form of a quote
- Documentation for applicant's and any named participants' salary levels
- Documentation for expenses in connection with sub-contracts
- De minimis declarations
Other appendices than those listed above will not be considered.
Your project must start between 1 June, 2018 and 1 January, 2019.
The fund’s assessment and assessment criteria
In all cases, IRFD will consider the extent to which the project you apply for will benefit Danish research. When assessing applications IRFD includes the criteria mentioned below, with quality of the project and applicant's qualifications being the most central assessment criteria.
IRFD places emphasis on fulfilment of the specific criteria to the widest possible extent. However, as the individual research councils make a specific overall assessment of each application, different criteria can be met to a greater or lesser extent. Thus, not all criteria will be relevant to all applications. Due to the level of competition between the applications, fulfilling all criteria does not automatically mean that a grant will be awarded.
IRFD will apply the following assessment criteria in relation to the instruments in this call:
Fulfilment of the instrument’s objective:
- Is the objective of the instrument sufficiently met?
- Does the project description demonstrate the project’s potential for scientific progress, innovation and originality (theoreticallly, methodologically and empirically)?
- Does the project represent innovative research rather than just being an expansion of current research?
- Does the project description make it probable that the project contributes to the internationalisation of Danish research?
- Does the project description contain:
- a clear and well-defined problem statement and objective?
- a description of the state of the art and/or the scientific challenges within the project’s research area, as well as of the project’s potential contributions in this regard?
- consistent and appropriate hypotheses?
- a description of the theoretical and/or methodological basis, including an argumentation that the proposed activities are relevant in relation to this theoretical/methodological basis?
- If relevant to the project: Does the project description provide argumentation for the connection between the project’s hypothesis, theory and method?
- If relevant to the project: Is there an adequate description of the project’s empirical material or data foundation, including any pilot projects and/or any preliminary data?
- If relevant: Is there an adequate level of synergy between the individual elements of the project?
- For applications to IRFD | Technology and Production Sciences, the following special criterion also applies: Does the project set out to solve a concrete problem, or does it have a clear application-oriented perspective?
- As applicant, have you documented:
- the scientific qualifications necessary for carrying out the project?
- a level of scientific production within the field that is necessary for carrying out the project?
- sufficient research management qualifications for carrying out the project?
- Have the other key participants in the project documented the necessary scientific qualifications for carrying out the project?
- Does the project involve the participation of relevant researchers from Denmark and abroad, and if relevant, is there an adequate level of collaboration with business partners?
- Is there a strategy for the organisation and management of the project, including an account of the distribution of work between the involved researchers?
- Are any PhD and postdoc scholarships well integrated, and do they fulfil a clear function in the project?
- Have sufficient resources been allocated to the project, including scientific resources, staffing and access to the necessary facilities and equipment?
- Is there a realistic work schedule and timetable, which considers e.g. the recruitment of any unnamed participants and the dissemination of the project’s findings?
- Does the project description account for project milestones and success criteria, and are they realistic?
- Are the project’s expenses proportionate to the anticipated scientific results?
- Are the proposed activities proportionate to the proposed budget? In this connection, is there a proper coherence between what is to be financed by the grant, when the funds will be used and the tasks and persons to be financed by the grant?
- If relevant, are any ethical aspects adequately examined?
Publication and dissemination of results:
Does the application provide an adequate account of the overall considerations with regard to the publication/dissemination/patenting of research results?
If relevant: Does the application account for the probability of and plans for obtaining patents in connection with the proposed project?
- Will the activities benefit Danish research?
- Does the project/activity include research education to a relevant extent?
- Does the project/activity contribute to improving the mobility of researchers, nationally/internationally and – if relevant – between research institutions and the business community?
A few specific assessment criteria only apply to specific councils/instruments. Please consult the respective sections in the call.